top of page

The Philosophy of Mathematics: A Base-12 Perspective

Sep 23, 2024

4 min read

1

84

2

 The Enigmatic Nature of Mathematics: Exploring Base-12 Mathematics and Its Philosophical Implications


In the vast expanse of human thought, mathematics stands as both a tool and a mystery. It's a language we've crafted to describe the universe, yet there's an ongoing debate: is mathematics an invention of the human mind, or is it a discovery, inherent in

the fabric of reality?


This question takes on new dimensions when viewed through the lens of base-12 mathematics, revealing a philosophical shift that could redefine our understanding of numbers and the cosmos. 

 

The Current Paradigm: Mathematics as a Human Construct 


Traditionally, mathematics is seen as a human creation, a tool we've developed to measure, predict, and understand the world around us. This perspective often leads to a divide between "pure" mathematics, celebrated for its abstract beauty and intellectual challenge, and "applied" mathematics, which engineers and scientists use to solve practical problems. Here, numbers and equations are like paint and canvas, tools for the artist (mathematician) to create with. 

 

Mathematics as Human Construct vs. Cosmic Structure 


Enter base-12, or duodecimal, not just as another numerical system but as a philosophical shift. Here, mathematics isn't merely applied to the universe; it emerges from it. Consider π (pi) in base-12, where it reveals patterns and an end to its digits, unlike the infinite, non-repeating decimal in base-10. This suggests that base-12 might not just be more practical but fundamentally aligned with the universe's structure. 

 

  • Philosophical Implications: If Ï€ in base-12 shows patterns, it hints at a universe where mathematics isn't imposed but inherent. This aligns with philosophies like Platonism, where mathematical forms exist independently of the physical world, waiting to be discovered rather than invented. 

 

  • The Pythagorean Dilemma: The story of Hippasus, a member of the Pythagorean community, who proved that √2 was irrational and was then drowned at sea as a result, reflects an ancient fear of mathematical truths that don't fit neatly into our understanding. Base-12 might offer a resolution, showing us that how we define irrational in base-10 could be different in another system, suggesting a deeper, universal truth. 

 

Base-12 Revelation: Pi and Universal Patterns 


In base-12, the geometry of π and other mathematical constants might reveal patterns that echo through the structure of matter itself. Here, mathematics isn't just about numbers but about the very fabric of reality. 

 

  • Quantum Geometry: The idea that at the quantum level, space isn't continuous but quantized could find a mathematical expression in base-12, where the ratios and patterns might reflect this quantized nature more accurately. 

 

  • The Universe as a Machine: Viewing the universe as a vast machine, its operations governed by precise mathematical laws, resonates with the base-12 perspective. Here, mathematics isn't just a tool for understanding but the blueprint of existence itself. 

 

Philosophical Frameworks Supporting Base-12 

 

  • Platonism: This philosophy posits that mathematical objects exist independently of the physical world. Base-12 mathematics could be seen as a more direct glimpse into this realm of pure forms, where the patterns of Ï€ and other constants reveal the true nature of mathematical entities. 

 

  • Structuralism: In this view, mathematics is about structures, not just numbers or shapes. Base-12 might offer a structure that aligns more closely with the universe's inherent patterns, suggesting that mathematics is less about human invention and more about recognizing and understanding these structures. 

 

  • Mathematical Realism: This philosophy holds that mathematical statements describe an objective reality. If base-12 reveals patterns in constants like Ï€, it supports the idea that these patterns exist independently, waiting to be discovered rather than invented. 

 

Future Implications of Base-12 Mathematics in Science and Technology 


Embracing base-12 mathematics isn't just about changing how we count; it's about redefining our relationship with the universe. 

 

  • Unifying Theories: Base-12 could bridge gaps in our understanding, potentially unifying quantum mechanics with general relativity by providing a mathematical framework that more accurately reflects reality's underlying structure. 

 

  • Technological Advancements: Just as binary (base-2) revolutionized computing, base-12 could lead to new technologies or scientific breakthroughs by aligning our mathematics more closely with natural processes. 

 

  • Philosophical Shift: This shift encourages us to see mathematics not as a human construct but as a universal language, one that we're only beginning to translate correctly. It invites a humility in our approach to knowledge, acknowledging that the universe might operate on principles we're just starting to comprehend. 

 

Conclusion 


The exploration of base-12 mathematics from a philosophical standpoint isn't just academic; it's a call to re-evaluate how we perceive reality. It suggests that the universe might be inherently mathematical, with base-12 offering a clearer lens through which to view its patterns. This perspective doesn't diminish the creativity or beauty of mathematics but rather elevates it to a cosmic art, where we're not just creators but also discoverers of a grand design. 

 

As we delve deeper into base-12, we might find ourselves not just solving equations but uncovering the very structure of existence. Mathematics, in this light, isn't a tool we apply to the world; it's the world itself, waiting for us to understand its language. Herein lies the true adventure of base-12 mathematics: not in changing our numbers, but in changing our minds to see the universe as it truly is. 

Related Posts

Comments (2)

Numerist
Dec 01, 2024

In any number base, the digits of pi do not show a pattern or end. Using a dodecagon instead of a circle means you are no longer using pi.

Like
dozenalmath
Dec 05, 2024
Replying to

Yes, well this is according to our man-made definitions. Yet, what if we changed our definitions? Is it impossible to divide 1 by 3 and not have a remainder? The answer is yes, it is impossible if we choose to stay within the confines of base-10. However, by switching to base-12, the answer to 1/3 becomes .4.


The only reason we believe that pi does not show a pattern is that there isn't one in base-10. No one is aware of the base-12 dodecagon pattern which has been introduced in the book: Understanding Base-12 Mathematics, How to Draw the Perfect Circle using Dozenal Geometry. To simply say that this dodecagon is the same as any dodecagon is to miss the point, and indicates that you are not familiar with it's unique properties, or how it is integrated with the base-12 Cartesian plane.


That this pattern can be used to plot any number of points on the circumference of the circle should not be arbitrarily dismissed. Again, to assume this feat is impossible because it can't be done in base-10 is to limit our mathematical possibilities by adhering to base-10 definitions.


The base is fundamental in mathematics, and to assume that they are all the same is simply that: an assumption, and until one has taken the time to look closely at what base-12 has to offer, it is an assumption based on limited data.


I encourage you to look deeper into the geometry from which the base-12 version of pi emerges, and ask yourself seriously: if our culture had started in base-12, and was familiar with this geometry that enabled the perfect division of the circle by literally dividing the diameter of the circle into its circumference, would we have rejected this number as irrelevant and continued searching for a geometry that was not able to accomplish this feat? I think not.

Like
bottom of page